Checking the Twitter trends each morning has become a bit of a habit for me. Usually I'm in search of that day's hot topic. Sometimes Twitter delivers. Yesterday for example, I discovered that Michael Gove had been reshuffled in Cameron's cabinet and is no longer Education Secretary (rejoice!). The trend was #GoneGove. Though I was disappointed this was not the eagerly awaited sequel to a Gillian Flynn novel, Twitter did its job. I, with my lazy, first world brain had gotten hold of some news.
Today however I check Twitter and what do I see? One, it is someone called Theo's birthday. Equally enrapturing I find that the trend #NiallTakeASelfieWithTheo is keeping Tweeters occupied across the land. Now I'm a light-hearted chappy when I want to be, but I want to pose the question: is this country in dire need of going outside?
I know the weather here's drizzly at best the vast majority of the time, but really? Niall Whatshisname from One Direction's nephew is one today. Why does seeing them in an image together beat everything else to become today's most talked about thing? A child in the world is a joyous thing, and I have no problem with Niall from One Direction. However the sheer volume of demands from Tweeters to desperately see a child they don't know is a peculiar site to behold.
I think I'm getting old before my years. I'm approaching 24 and I believe I'm entering the window of my life where I'm often confused by some things young people (and some slightly worrying older people) do. I don't really want this to happen. On the one hand I love being young. The full use of my hips, the hope for a long and illustrious career, the so-far lack of wrinkles. These things are wonderful. However, some days I wonder if celebrity culture has gone a little too far. This is how I know I'm beginning to settle into my slippers and find myself powerless to prevent it.
I feel sorry for the celebrities. They are in fact just blokes and lasses, regular joes and janes who we decide are better than us and deserve to be lauded to the point that a nation cries out for an image of them on Snapchat or Instagram or Twitter or Tumblr or Pinterest or a combination of the above.
I worry I'm becoming an old grumpus. Maybe I should join the masses and wait, eagerly for the immenent iPhone image of Whatshisname and Theo. Then I look out of my window. It's sunny outside. We are a nation of cheese rollers and black-pudding throwers and May Day festival dancers.
In the words of Hugh Grant in Love, Actually - the only PM I'm likely to listen to: 'we're the country of William Shakespeare, Churchill, The Beatles, Sean Connery, Harry Potter. David Beckham's right foot, David Beckham's left foot for that matter.' Maybe if we weren't so concerned with images of these pretty people and aspired to do great things with our days, we would have some national pride. We should. Get out into the world, read a book, write a book, bake a cake, hold a large and ridiculous event for charity. Invite a friend over and watch that classic film you've always wondered about. Go on a long road trip with no destination and find some corner of the country where brilliant things happen. We're a great country, but only when we want it to be.
I hate to add gloom to happiness but togetherness is a tremendous thing. So maybe if we were all as like-minded as Tweeters are in wanting to see pictures of 1D, on things such as equal rights for all, ending poverty and doing something about the stupid wages of footballers, the world would be a better place to live in.
This Sunday I attend the Hastings Pirate Day and dress up as a pirate along with an entire town for the third year running. I'll see family and friends and drink drinks and enjoy the sun and the beach (hopefully). I'd urge people to do the same. Maybe that dangerous, scary, doom ridden outside is a little more interesting than what One Direction did today.
Maybe I'll take a selfie.
Wednesday, 16 July 2014
Niall Whatshisname or 'David Tries Being Young and Hip'
Labels:
#HappyBirthdayTheo,
#NiallTakeaSelfieWithTheo,
1D,
celebrity,
culture,
Great Britain,
Hugh Grant,
Love Actually,
Niall,
One Direction,
selfies,
trends,
Twitter
Friday, 27 June 2014
What is Facebook for? or 'David Tries Being Socially Savvy'
Seriously though. I'm not questioning the existence of Facebook or any social media site. Checking Facebook is one of the first things I do in the morning. Because I'm bored? Because I'm nosy? Because I'm a fidgeter and I don't smoke?
I do ask myself the question a lot: what is Facebook for? As in - what are we supposed to put on Facebook and do different social media sites require different types of content from their users?
We get asked that same question every day. Several times for most of us. 'What's on your mind?' For those of us who don't really pay attention (me included) that's what Facebook asks in it's status bar. A lot of people will look at this and think it's a rant about what people put on Facebook. And I could. I probably will. But my argument isn't exactly what people put on there. My qualm is with Facebook itself.
It annoys me in a lot of ways. I don't think anyone who owns Facebook isn't annoyed by some of what their friends put on it. I bet I'm a huge culprit of this. Sometimes, as I put up my latest status, a photo, my latest page of my Page a Day project - does anyone really care?
But then what is it for? Who am I to say what someone decides to put on their personal Facebook page. I do believe there are some limits though. I am strongly against internet bullying. I've fallen out with people because I didn't agree what they put on their Facebook because some things are just offensive. I stick by my guns to this day, because as strong (and right) as freedom of speech is, sometimes I think you have to wonder. Will what I'm putting out their for the internet to see be offensive to someone? If the answer is yes, then maybe think about what you're writing.
Very few people actually want to cause offense. And if you want to put your opinion as your status that's absolutely fine, just construct it in a way that sounds like a debate, not an outright accusation or insult. And that's something I see every day. Not a lot on Facebook, but on Twitter and especially Tumblr, that wonderful land where everyone has an opinion and everyone is always right so help them God.
So I'd never say people shouldn't put their opinions on Facebook. That's censorship, against human rights and just a little bit Nazi. But thinking about the words that come out of our mouth should extend to our typing fingers. We grow up being told to think about what we're saying. I do think some people need to consider what they put on the internet.
So what is it for? Debate? Showing off is a big one. Sometimes we use Facebook to show our wares, our latest holiday, shiny new car or purchase. Sometimes I think the world was better without it. Because sometimes I sit there, look at someone showing off and Peter Griffin jumps into my head. 'Who the hell cares?'
But of course some people do. Family and friends who actually want to see people do well. Facebook's wonderful for that. So the fault there might lie with me. Am I bitter for seeing someone with a better day than mine? The answer, usually is yes. So who's in the wrong? Nobody really other than Facebook itself. But then wouldn't small updates about your day be more suited to Twitter? That stream of snippets of our thoughts, days and whims?
Is anything that breeds jealousy a good thing? But then is that our own faults as jealous people. More often than not I'm just inclined to side with Peter Griffin. But it's an interesting debate. One I'm sure that will kick off on Facebook. Most likely in capital letters.
Facebook is the land of the misconstrued. The place where we discover that sarcasm really doesn't translate online. Everyone's looking for an argument and everyone has an opinion to give. Do we have a right to? Yes. Is it tiring sometimes. Yes. Should I stop thinking about it? Probably.
A lot of people who know me will smell a double standard. I met my girlfriend of 2 years because of the internet. Through YouTube video blogs and then Tumblr. We spent a year living 80 miles apart and Facebook made that a lot easier. Facebook has a thousand plus points to balance the negatives. The internet is a wonderful place. Here is an infinite land where everyone is connected and you can create content: videos, films, books, blogs, art, plays, anything you desire and most of it is completely free. Like most things on earth you can always find a flip side. The half of the glass that's full. So I am enternally grateful for the internet.
So what is Facebook for? Procrastinating? Showing off? Taking away the necessity for conversation and actually having friends? What's the point when there's a handy like button to show that you're still hanging around. I like to think a big reason me and Charlotte celebrate our 2 year anniversary in just under two weeks is that our relationship wasn't exclusively on Facebook. We made the time for each other in spite of those 80 miles.
We're all culprits of the Facebook downsides, that's the annoying thing. Some days, when I look at Facebook and consider all these things I do wonder. We were probably better off without.
Will that stop me going on it every 5 minutes?
The internet has us. There is no escape.
Don't get me started on Tumblr.
I do ask myself the question a lot: what is Facebook for? As in - what are we supposed to put on Facebook and do different social media sites require different types of content from their users?
We get asked that same question every day. Several times for most of us. 'What's on your mind?' For those of us who don't really pay attention (me included) that's what Facebook asks in it's status bar. A lot of people will look at this and think it's a rant about what people put on Facebook. And I could. I probably will. But my argument isn't exactly what people put on there. My qualm is with Facebook itself.
It annoys me in a lot of ways. I don't think anyone who owns Facebook isn't annoyed by some of what their friends put on it. I bet I'm a huge culprit of this. Sometimes, as I put up my latest status, a photo, my latest page of my Page a Day project - does anyone really care?
But then what is it for? Who am I to say what someone decides to put on their personal Facebook page. I do believe there are some limits though. I am strongly against internet bullying. I've fallen out with people because I didn't agree what they put on their Facebook because some things are just offensive. I stick by my guns to this day, because as strong (and right) as freedom of speech is, sometimes I think you have to wonder. Will what I'm putting out their for the internet to see be offensive to someone? If the answer is yes, then maybe think about what you're writing.
Very few people actually want to cause offense. And if you want to put your opinion as your status that's absolutely fine, just construct it in a way that sounds like a debate, not an outright accusation or insult. And that's something I see every day. Not a lot on Facebook, but on Twitter and especially Tumblr, that wonderful land where everyone has an opinion and everyone is always right so help them God.
So I'd never say people shouldn't put their opinions on Facebook. That's censorship, against human rights and just a little bit Nazi. But thinking about the words that come out of our mouth should extend to our typing fingers. We grow up being told to think about what we're saying. I do think some people need to consider what they put on the internet.
So what is it for? Debate? Showing off is a big one. Sometimes we use Facebook to show our wares, our latest holiday, shiny new car or purchase. Sometimes I think the world was better without it. Because sometimes I sit there, look at someone showing off and Peter Griffin jumps into my head. 'Who the hell cares?'
But of course some people do. Family and friends who actually want to see people do well. Facebook's wonderful for that. So the fault there might lie with me. Am I bitter for seeing someone with a better day than mine? The answer, usually is yes. So who's in the wrong? Nobody really other than Facebook itself. But then wouldn't small updates about your day be more suited to Twitter? That stream of snippets of our thoughts, days and whims?
Is anything that breeds jealousy a good thing? But then is that our own faults as jealous people. More often than not I'm just inclined to side with Peter Griffin. But it's an interesting debate. One I'm sure that will kick off on Facebook. Most likely in capital letters.
Facebook is the land of the misconstrued. The place where we discover that sarcasm really doesn't translate online. Everyone's looking for an argument and everyone has an opinion to give. Do we have a right to? Yes. Is it tiring sometimes. Yes. Should I stop thinking about it? Probably.
A lot of people who know me will smell a double standard. I met my girlfriend of 2 years because of the internet. Through YouTube video blogs and then Tumblr. We spent a year living 80 miles apart and Facebook made that a lot easier. Facebook has a thousand plus points to balance the negatives. The internet is a wonderful place. Here is an infinite land where everyone is connected and you can create content: videos, films, books, blogs, art, plays, anything you desire and most of it is completely free. Like most things on earth you can always find a flip side. The half of the glass that's full. So I am enternally grateful for the internet.
So what is Facebook for? Procrastinating? Showing off? Taking away the necessity for conversation and actually having friends? What's the point when there's a handy like button to show that you're still hanging around. I like to think a big reason me and Charlotte celebrate our 2 year anniversary in just under two weeks is that our relationship wasn't exclusively on Facebook. We made the time for each other in spite of those 80 miles.
We're all culprits of the Facebook downsides, that's the annoying thing. Some days, when I look at Facebook and consider all these things I do wonder. We were probably better off without.
Will that stop me going on it every 5 minutes?
The internet has us. There is no escape.
Don't get me started on Tumblr.
Labels:
Facebook,
friends,
internet,
messages,
opinions,
Social Media,
status,
tumblr,
Tweets,
Twitter,
what's on your mind
Wednesday, 11 June 2014
Every 4 Years or 'David Tries Taking Stock'
And World Cup fever grips the nation.
I love the World Cup. The wall chart is at the ready. The excitement held in the minds of millions is palpable. We've even got some nice Brazillian weather to accompany it. Of all its accomplishments, so far the tournement has made me think. Taking place every 4 years, World Cups are far apart but close together. If you look back to last World Cup, South Africa 2010 and consider where you were, what you were doing and who you were with, I bet you'll be surprised at what you've done in a short space of time.
I for one was standing in Hyde Park with my mum. We were watching England play Germany on the big screen put up to entertain concert goers before Paul McCartney took to the stage with 38 hits loved by millions. Unfortunately, England entertained fans a great deal more than Elvis Costello who came on, played 4 songs and then (understandably) left as the oohs and aahs were directed at England's efforts to topple the European giants. We didn't even get 'Oliver's Army' or 'She'.
The setting is important as, for me, that day marked a turning point in my life. I like to call Summer 2010 the summer of gigs. I saw Paul McCartney, Eric Clapton and Green Day in a very quick succession. This summer also marked the run up to me starting my degree in English at St Mary's University. It's strange looking back. At that day, in the sweltering sun, pulling up the grass-turned-hay, I was on a gap year, I had no job, I was single. I'm not afraid or ashamed to admit that I didn't have a great gap year. I wasn't productive enough or proactive enough to get myself moving.
Now, looking back, I can happily say that me and Charlotte: the missus, partner, girlfriend, will be moving in together in a couple of months and we celebrate our 2 year anniversary very soon. I am coming to the end of my Master's degree in Children's Literature after proudly graduating with a 2.1 and honours from that English BA. On top of this I have two jobs. One at my university library gaining a backbone of experience that will hopefully carry me into a career. The other as an intern at the Wimbledon BookFest. Also today I attend a meeting as a judge of the BookFest's Young Writer's Competition; a position awarded to me on account of my writing, my MA and my knowledge of literature. I'm proud to have been a film journalist for 11 months with The Hollywood News, interviewing the likes of Jason Statham, Dara O'Briain, Helen Mirren and Steve Coogan. I also had my first ever published work there. I've made great friends, I've lived in halls, I've lived in a house. I've explored London and found a list of favourite places that have become part of me. I was even longlisted for a short story anthology. I've read books, I've written, I got a tattoo, I've started projects, completed a few and generally had the best four years of my life. I have a feeling I've done more than that, but off the top of my head that's pretty damn great.
And all this in the space of 4 years. It makes me excited for the future, to know that by the time the next World Cup grips the nation, I may have a new list of accomplishments to be proud of.
So I'd urge you to do the same. Have a real think and consider where you've come from and where you're going. And if this proves anything, as television and advert breaks seem to be telling us: the World Cup really does relate to everything.
I love the World Cup. The wall chart is at the ready. The excitement held in the minds of millions is palpable. We've even got some nice Brazillian weather to accompany it. Of all its accomplishments, so far the tournement has made me think. Taking place every 4 years, World Cups are far apart but close together. If you look back to last World Cup, South Africa 2010 and consider where you were, what you were doing and who you were with, I bet you'll be surprised at what you've done in a short space of time.
I for one was standing in Hyde Park with my mum. We were watching England play Germany on the big screen put up to entertain concert goers before Paul McCartney took to the stage with 38 hits loved by millions. Unfortunately, England entertained fans a great deal more than Elvis Costello who came on, played 4 songs and then (understandably) left as the oohs and aahs were directed at England's efforts to topple the European giants. We didn't even get 'Oliver's Army' or 'She'.
The setting is important as, for me, that day marked a turning point in my life. I like to call Summer 2010 the summer of gigs. I saw Paul McCartney, Eric Clapton and Green Day in a very quick succession. This summer also marked the run up to me starting my degree in English at St Mary's University. It's strange looking back. At that day, in the sweltering sun, pulling up the grass-turned-hay, I was on a gap year, I had no job, I was single. I'm not afraid or ashamed to admit that I didn't have a great gap year. I wasn't productive enough or proactive enough to get myself moving.
Now, looking back, I can happily say that me and Charlotte: the missus, partner, girlfriend, will be moving in together in a couple of months and we celebrate our 2 year anniversary very soon. I am coming to the end of my Master's degree in Children's Literature after proudly graduating with a 2.1 and honours from that English BA. On top of this I have two jobs. One at my university library gaining a backbone of experience that will hopefully carry me into a career. The other as an intern at the Wimbledon BookFest. Also today I attend a meeting as a judge of the BookFest's Young Writer's Competition; a position awarded to me on account of my writing, my MA and my knowledge of literature. I'm proud to have been a film journalist for 11 months with The Hollywood News, interviewing the likes of Jason Statham, Dara O'Briain, Helen Mirren and Steve Coogan. I also had my first ever published work there. I've made great friends, I've lived in halls, I've lived in a house. I've explored London and found a list of favourite places that have become part of me. I was even longlisted for a short story anthology. I've read books, I've written, I got a tattoo, I've started projects, completed a few and generally had the best four years of my life. I have a feeling I've done more than that, but off the top of my head that's pretty damn great.
And all this in the space of 4 years. It makes me excited for the future, to know that by the time the next World Cup grips the nation, I may have a new list of accomplishments to be proud of.
So I'd urge you to do the same. Have a real think and consider where you've come from and where you're going. And if this proves anything, as television and advert breaks seem to be telling us: the World Cup really does relate to everything.
Labels:
2010,
2014,
BA,
Brazil,
Children's Literature,
England,
English,
Germany,
girlfriend,
jobs,
journalism,
MA,
Paul McCartney,
relationship,
Wimbledon BookFest,
World Cup,
writing
Sunday, 25 May 2014
Immediate Education Reform or 'David Tries Being the Education Secretary'
Michael Gove is an idiot.
This is a fact. He's out of touch and quite frankly a dangerous influence to have so high up the pyramid of power.
This morning it has been revealed that his new curriculum for GCSE students omits To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee and Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck. Two of the best and most important novels ever written. They're novels that appear on scores of lists of favourite books, and communicate important messages to the reader. Yet the fact that Of Mice and Men being in the reading lists of 90% of GCSE students is seen as 'worrying' by Mr Gove.
I'm sorry, but why. A novel about two men who share a dream. It shows that life is difficult and sometimes you don't get what you want. It's a sad novel, but an important novel. It's a 20th Century novel.
Gove believes that anything post-1800 is unimportant. His curriculum is composed of Shakespeare, Austen, Dickens and romantic poets. I'm not saying that these aren't important. But the point is they're not more important than anything else. They're authors, not gods. They're highly acclaimed because people like Gove sit in their ivory towers and deem it so. If I had a lot of money, I could get myself into a position of power. I could buy myself a great deal of land, get myself into the circles of the high and mighty and forge myself a career in politics. And then I could say We're Going on a Bear Hunt is the finest novel in the English language. And it is one of them. What kid hasn't heard it? What child doesn't have 'we're not scared' as part of their personal identity? And if they don't then that's fine too because no one person should measure importance in literature. What if a Twilight fanatic became education secretary, or a 50 Shades desperado? We'd be taught that male-centric relationships and lack of consent bondage sessions are the most important things in literature.
But that's the point, anyone with power and money can say anything's great. And whatever Gove's reasoning, he's saying that a collection of authors who are a) all dead and b) all English, are the most important things our children should be reading.
But lets look at the children in the class for a second. How many people are 100% English these days. I'm not, I'm Irish/Scottish/Italian and I'm not seeing my nationality represented on the curriculum. That's just an example. What about middle eastern children? Wouldn't they benefit from seeing something like The Kite Runner on the curriculum? How about Noughts and Crosses? Malorie Blackman's groundbreaking novel that shows us that race and labels should not be an issue. Michael Gove's message is if you're not English then you're not important. Congratulations, you've just alienated the vast majority of English classrooms.
Diversity is so important in modern Great Britain. We are a multicultural nation and this should be celebrated, not locked in a cupboard and deemed 'unimportant' and 'worrying'. What's next? Only British artists in galleries? Only British musicians on the radio?
In my opinion, the curriculum of all subjects, not just English, should be decided by a council of teachers, authors, students, politicians, parents and whoever else has a say on the subject in question. Not by one man with the world's most elite view on literature believing that every child will relate to someone who's been dead 400 years.
Ask any teenager these days what literature they think is important and a lot of them won't say Shakespeare. They'll say The Perks of Being a Wallflower. They'll say The Fault in Our Stars. They'll say Divergent. Why do we disgregard these novels purely because a) the authors are alive and well, b) they sit in the Young Adult section not Classics, and c) if you're Michael Gove, they're American? I could write an essay each on these novels and a thousand others why they deserve just as much right on the syllabus as Hamlet.
All novels have equal importance because they can mean something to someone. I disgregarded Twilight and 50 Shades of Grey earlier in this blog. Just because I have a personal dislike for them doesn't mean they should be disregarded either. They mean something to a lot of people. No one person, myself included should have the final say on matters as important as literature.
I urge you, whatever party Michael Gove sits with in next year's general elections, vote the opposite. He's a dangerous man.
We need an immediate education reform. Basically, boot grandad out.
This is a fact. He's out of touch and quite frankly a dangerous influence to have so high up the pyramid of power.
This morning it has been revealed that his new curriculum for GCSE students omits To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee and Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck. Two of the best and most important novels ever written. They're novels that appear on scores of lists of favourite books, and communicate important messages to the reader. Yet the fact that Of Mice and Men being in the reading lists of 90% of GCSE students is seen as 'worrying' by Mr Gove.
I'm sorry, but why. A novel about two men who share a dream. It shows that life is difficult and sometimes you don't get what you want. It's a sad novel, but an important novel. It's a 20th Century novel.
Gove believes that anything post-1800 is unimportant. His curriculum is composed of Shakespeare, Austen, Dickens and romantic poets. I'm not saying that these aren't important. But the point is they're not more important than anything else. They're authors, not gods. They're highly acclaimed because people like Gove sit in their ivory towers and deem it so. If I had a lot of money, I could get myself into a position of power. I could buy myself a great deal of land, get myself into the circles of the high and mighty and forge myself a career in politics. And then I could say We're Going on a Bear Hunt is the finest novel in the English language. And it is one of them. What kid hasn't heard it? What child doesn't have 'we're not scared' as part of their personal identity? And if they don't then that's fine too because no one person should measure importance in literature. What if a Twilight fanatic became education secretary, or a 50 Shades desperado? We'd be taught that male-centric relationships and lack of consent bondage sessions are the most important things in literature.
But that's the point, anyone with power and money can say anything's great. And whatever Gove's reasoning, he's saying that a collection of authors who are a) all dead and b) all English, are the most important things our children should be reading.
But lets look at the children in the class for a second. How many people are 100% English these days. I'm not, I'm Irish/Scottish/Italian and I'm not seeing my nationality represented on the curriculum. That's just an example. What about middle eastern children? Wouldn't they benefit from seeing something like The Kite Runner on the curriculum? How about Noughts and Crosses? Malorie Blackman's groundbreaking novel that shows us that race and labels should not be an issue. Michael Gove's message is if you're not English then you're not important. Congratulations, you've just alienated the vast majority of English classrooms.
Diversity is so important in modern Great Britain. We are a multicultural nation and this should be celebrated, not locked in a cupboard and deemed 'unimportant' and 'worrying'. What's next? Only British artists in galleries? Only British musicians on the radio?
In my opinion, the curriculum of all subjects, not just English, should be decided by a council of teachers, authors, students, politicians, parents and whoever else has a say on the subject in question. Not by one man with the world's most elite view on literature believing that every child will relate to someone who's been dead 400 years.
Ask any teenager these days what literature they think is important and a lot of them won't say Shakespeare. They'll say The Perks of Being a Wallflower. They'll say The Fault in Our Stars. They'll say Divergent. Why do we disgregard these novels purely because a) the authors are alive and well, b) they sit in the Young Adult section not Classics, and c) if you're Michael Gove, they're American? I could write an essay each on these novels and a thousand others why they deserve just as much right on the syllabus as Hamlet.
All novels have equal importance because they can mean something to someone. I disgregarded Twilight and 50 Shades of Grey earlier in this blog. Just because I have a personal dislike for them doesn't mean they should be disregarded either. They mean something to a lot of people. No one person, myself included should have the final say on matters as important as literature.
I urge you, whatever party Michael Gove sits with in next year's general elections, vote the opposite. He's a dangerous man.
We need an immediate education reform. Basically, boot grandad out.
Labels:
austen,
dickens,
education,
literature,
Michael Gove,
of mice and men,
romantics,
shakespeare,
Syllabus,
to kill a mockingbird
Tuesday, 22 April 2014
26 Simple Changes or 'David Tries Being the Head of FIFA'
After this morning's sacking of David Moyes, I've decided that the news in football has become repetetive and boring and things need to change. How many times do we wake up and find that yet another manager has been sacked, or that a player has dived, cheated on their wife or just been paid the combined wages of a small country?
In reaction to this, I've decided to take over the job as the head of FIFA and compile a list of things that I believe would improve the beautiful game. Enjoy.
This is why I shouldn't be left alone in the mornings.
In reaction to this, I've decided to take over the job as the head of FIFA and compile a list of things that I believe would improve the beautiful game. Enjoy.
- There should be a season where fans are hired as managers. Just for a laugh.
- All players should be fitted with those electric shock buzzers, to be used at the opposition manager's discretion. Once per game.
- There should be an option to make the game more interesting after 3 goals are conceded depending on which manager presses a big red button first. This should include swapping the ball either for an exercise-ball, or a ping pong ball. Hilarity ensues.
- Once per game, a manager can initiate a rule that gets rid of offside for 3 minutes. Problem is, this works for both teams...
- Players who feign injury should be shot. If it works for horses it can work for them.
- Performance pay decided by fans. If they play well, we can give them a thumbs up and they earn a pound. Let's end world poverty and put the money in sport to better use. (This goes for all sports not just football)
- Draws should be settled by either Pub Quiz, or alternatively to add a bit of showbiz, and to get more of Philip Schofield on television, a round of The Cube.
- We invent a Golden Snitch and rules work the same as Quidditch.
- Come to think of it, why don't we just invent Quidditch?
- If that doesn't work, I think Bludgers are an excellent idea.
- 0-0 after 85 minutes? Release the lions.
- Bit strong? Release those monkeys that pull windscreen wipers off cars at Longleat.
- Bring back Gladiators. Complete with Ulrika and the Fash. Not really related to football, this should just happen. Classic Gladiators, not that rubbish copy they spat out a couple of years back.
- Come to think of it, why not combine rule number 13 with rule number 3? Managers have to complete the Eliminator and can win the game for their team.
- Players who sneak up the touchline on a throw in should be punished by having a person following them around the pitch for the remainder of the game, flicking them on the back of the ears.
- Women's football should be put on TV. High time for equality.
- Red Card? Why not Bush Tucker Trial?
- A football player cheats on their partner? Must play remainder of the season wearing a tutu.
- All players and managers must honour their contracts, if they or the board want to break it, see rule 14.
- Still a draw after 90 minutes and The Cube? Dance off. Everybody wins.
- Commentators should be fans of the two teams playing.
- On one seat in the stadium is a golden ticket. That lucky person can replace any player on the pitch and cannot be substituted.
- All seats in the stadium should be replaced with sofas. We pay enough for tickets.
- Man of the match gets a little crown to wear next game. On the other hand, the worst player of the match must play their following fixture in their pants. Old school PE style.
- FIFA apology rules apply. Everything from: 5-0 defeat? Grovelling apology on Facebook to 20-0 defeat? Letter of apology to the Queen for awful play.
- And last but by no means least. The referee should be armed with a cattle prod, mainly to keep John Terry quiet.
This is why I shouldn't be left alone in the mornings.
Labels:
David Moyes,
Football,
Gladiators,
Golden Snitch,
improvements,
Man U,
manager,
new ideas,
offside,
Philip Scofield,
Quidditch,
rules,
Sacking,
The Cube
Sunday, 23 March 2014
28th Best in the World or 'David Tries Writing for an Anthology'
The real short story is - I didn't get published in an anthology. This is how I tried, and the story, for those who want to read it.
Roehampton University have just started Fincham Press to match themselves with the big guns over at Oxford and Cambridge University Presses, along with all the other big universities out there who publish their own work. Every year (for 2 years now) they've run and will be running a competition for the students of Creative Writing, English and Children's Literature to be published in an anthology of short stories. So - published, no agent, my name in a book - sold.
I entered the competition with my short story 'If I Were a Blackbird'. I'm very pleased to announce that while I didn't make the 21 winners who will be published, I've just been emailed and told that I made the longlist of 28 out of 171 entries. So basically I was somewhere among the seven runners up. Now published I'm not, but that's pretty damn good in my opinion.
As the speaker, Dr Bernadine Evaristo said at the Fincham Press launch event I attended with the missus, failure is part of an author's life.
I'm not taking this as a failure. If I was the 28th best author in the world (whoever decides that), I'd be the happiest person on earth (well...apart from numbers 1 through 27...). Still, a group of judges read my work and said it was good enough to be published. So I'm taking this as a success - I'm getting warmer.
So for those of you who are interested, here's my short story, and a congratulations to the 21 entries who were published and everyone else in the competition who was brave enough to enter. Roll on next year…
If I Were a Blackbird
‘If I were a blackbird, I’d whistle and
sing.’
The song drowns
out my other thoughts, my granddad’s voice still fresh. I’d give all my pencils
and paints just to have him here. But I can’t, so I sing his songs to myself.
One of infinite fragments of Patrick Busby I wish I’d recorded on my phone,
just to listen to when I need him. A fourteen-year-old boy who still needs his
granddad, I bet I’m the only one.
‘Am I
weird-looking, Eve?’ I ask across the picnic blanket. ‘Be honest.’
Eve Quinn
stares back at me, a half chewed ball of melon puffing her cheek like a
hamster.
‘When you ask
questions like that, yeah,’ she states, taking a big swallow.
I begin to
reply but my head jerks to the side with a wet slap.
‘You get radio
on those things, Busby?’ The shout comes from across wet field by the pond that
divides the boy’s and girl’s schools. I came to St George’s to escape people
like this.
I wipe the side
of my face with the handkerchief Eve hands me, and catch her looking down at
her sandwich.
‘Ignore them,’ she
mumbles. She never acknowledges them,
but she doesn’t stand up for me either. I watch them move towards the woods at
the east end of the pond, laughing. I gaze over at the sunflower field in the
west: a yellow line in the distance tracing the outline of my favourite place
to draw.
‘I don’t know
why they ever thought a lake would stop boys and girls slipping through the
hedges to meet up,’ Eve says, changing the subject like always. ‘There’s all
sorts of ways across.’
I nod, taking
another sandwich.
‘I mean there’s
the boats?’
I imagine I’m a
pirate, sailing away. I know they’re meant for rowing practice, and I’d never
voice my fantasies to anyone, not Eve, definitely not Dad. Mum had listened,
before she died too.
‘Why don’t you tell someone?’ Eve’s looking at
me and I can tell I’ve been staring into nothing. ‘And stop that!’ she snaps,
batting my hand from the eyebrow where I’ve begun to pluck the brown hairs from
the end. I’ve tried everything; plastering my fingers, wearing gloves, but
still I pull.
Her
blue-streaked, black hair stands up at funny angles, her nose too long and
pointed. Why isn’t she picked on for that?
She reaches
across the blanket for another jam sandwich. That’s why I like her. Not many
girls still pack a chequered blanket when they go for picnics, or go for
picnics full stop in November.
‘Because it’s
hard over here.’ I always say the same thing. Those five easy words that make
my life seem more difficult than everyone else’s.
‘But that’s the
point, Callum,’ she pleads, pushing the plate of bready triangles closer to my
toes. ‘Do you think it’s not hard for us? Everyone has struggles. We all find
ourselves targets sometimes. You either learn to dodge or throw something back.
We come here because it’s different, because there’s something particular in
the romance of the two opposing manors lost in the woods.’
She looks so
suddenly embarrassed. My bald brow crinkles and my usually affectionless hand
goes out to comfort her. Touching her purple-tighted knee I panic and consider
pulling away, but decide to leave it there and she lets me.
‘You don’t talk like real people.’ Before I
can stop myself, I add: ‘You’d be interesting to draw.’ My cheeks flare and I’m
quick to avert my eyes.
‘We are weird,
Busby,’ she says, laughing. My hand slips onto the blanket. ‘And the truth is I
came here because my mum and dad did. They met over the lake just like us.
They’d go crazy if they knew we were meeting like this though.’
I think of my
parents, just for a second, the mother who died long ago, the father who
forgets my birthday: the reason why I miss my granddad so much, sitting at home
with his stacks of Irish records and dusty old draught board. My rock after Mum
died, singing me Irish songs about blackbirds when I needed comfort; now a constant
reminder that my excuse for a father is all I have left.
‘Why?’ I ask.
‘You’re a boy,
and boys are dangerous and are only interested in getting me pregnant.’
‘I don’t really
think I’d ever do that,’ I reassure, laughing and scratching my earlobe. My hand
unconsciously creeps along my brow and tugs on the sparse hairs.
‘Stop it!’ Eve
bats my hand away again. ‘You do it for everything!’
‘I can’t help
it,’ I snap. I fall silent, guilty. ‘I’m sorry.’
‘Don’t say
sorry,’ she says. ‘I just don’t want to be the one who makes you do that.’
‘I always do
it,’ I say. ‘When I’m nervous, happy or when I’m drawing or reading, I find my
hand pulling and I know I can’t stop. It’s become comfortable and I hate it.’
She has such a
pitying expression on her face I want to pull again.
‘Except…’ I
say, hesitant.
‘Except what?’
she pushes.
‘When I read
about art,’ I admit. ‘Or when I sit in the sunflower field and get caught up in
the life and death in a living thing.’ I always bring my sketchbook in my bag,
even when I’m not going to art. I aim to join great men, unappreciated in their
times. ‘That’s when my hands stop
twitching. If I could take a tent and set up camp there, away from the school,
away from Dad, then I would. I came here because he’s fed up of me. I thought I
could escape, but all I’ve found is a trap; a lie.’
Eve is smiling
and I don’t know why.
‘You don’t talk
like real people either,’ she says. ‘Come on then.’ She jumps up, taking the
hamper and the blanket from underneath me. ‘We’re going to the sunflower field;
you can draw a masterpiece and I can draw stick-men.’
*
I love art on
Thursday mornings. I always get the seat by the window and take to my work with
fresh vigour with the beautiful expanse of Norfolk spread before me. Maybe Eve
is right, maybe it is beautiful here.
I smile. I
filled about six pages in my sketchbook sitting with her in the sunflower
field, concealed by the tall stalks. She didn’t draw but danced around instead,
leaping from stones and fiddled with yellow petals.
But it’s the
separation from her, locked in my dorm room at night where my hand starts to
twitch. The silent, ever present urge to fix the stabbing pain in my brow.
I wish my
window opened more than two inches. If it did, I’d want to creep along the
ledge that runs around this old country house like a spider. Maybe I’d sneak
into their rooms and bite them as
they sleep.
But even as a
spider I know I’d be gutless.
I think of Mrs
Turner’s last words that day:
‘All great
artists have their troubles. Sometimes great art is born in response to great
pain and terrible sadness.’
And those three
terrible boys just sit at the back, sticking two fingers in their mouths.
But Mrs
Turner’s words speak to me. My world is a picture, and if I stop and appreciate
it every now and again, the struggles beauty is born under isn’t wasted.
I swing my
canvas bag onto my shoulder. But I turn into a wall. A cigarette-breathed wall
named James Spade.
‘Why you
smiling Sput-dick?’ he spits. I assume that penis puns on satellites are the
height of sophisticated, ear-related humour.
I wish I could
articulate the thoughts in my head, the long list of scathing retorts I’ve been
building for months.
‘I
don’t know,’ I murmur instead.
‘I thought
Turner said you had to experience pain to do good stuff.’ He smirks. ‘I thought
I’d help her little artist.’
I realise his
friends are behind him, like hyenas to his prowling predator.
James seizes a
clump of my t-shirt and pushes me back onto the desk. I try to scream but he
clamps a reeking hand over my mouth. I kick but I’m weak and he’s well trained
in torture.
‘You want to be
like that guy who cut off his ear?’ he sneers.
‘It’d be an improvement.’ One of the others passes him the scissors.
I’m sweating,
and crying, and struggling but it’s pointless. I can’t move under the bigger
boy’s weight. Maybe I deserve this.
He’s still
laughing as he places the blunt blades to my ear. I hear the slide of metal on
metal and it’s so intimately close I think I’m going to throw up.
I’m shouting
‘please’ and ‘no’ but his hand is a gag. My tears are rivers down the sides of
my face and the table is paper for him to draw in my blood.
He clamps the
blades down, laughing. The pain is immeasurable, intense, spreading out from
the point with overpowering force. The cold of metal and the air on my exposed,
bloody flesh is painful and horrific and disgusting and I do throw up this
time.
He’s repulsed;
blood and vomit all over him as he draws back and I scream, scream, scream. My
voice fills the room, the school and the moor and I wish I would die.
*
It’s been two
weeks. James got kicked out of school. Of course he did. I’m due to give
evidence at his court hearing.
I have no
eyebrows left to speak of. The helplessness of it all keeps me in my hospital
bed for a week, and now in the solitude of my dorm bed a week later. Dad
doesn’t want to know. ‘Should have fought
back,’ he said. ‘Didn’t I teach you nothing?’
I can’t sleep
because my ear still hurts so much. Mrs Chudleigh in the sick room said: ‘You just have to sleep on your right side’.
As if I can control how I sleep. I end up sprawled out most nights and
sometimes on the floor.
This means I’m
awake, like usual when the rapping comes at the misty window above my bed; a
square of starry night covered by leaden criss-cross panes.
I jump up and
throw open the moth-eaten old curtains.
She looks like
a pixie in the moonlight, like Tinkerbell coming to take me back to Neverland
after I decided growing up wasn’t worth it. Her blue hair is tied back and
she’s wearing a Ramones t-shirt.
Clearly she’s
taken to desperate measures to reach me. She braces herself, seizes the frame
of the window and pulls. The supposedly ‘suicide-proof’ locks break easily with
her touch.
‘How did you do
that?’ I ask, shocked.
‘Grow a pair,
Busby!’ she challenges. ‘You’ve got to put your back into it.’
Instead of
climbing in, she stays perched there, looking at me.
‘Come on,’ she
commands. ‘This place is so much cooler at night.’
I pick at the
hem of my pyjama top.
‘Callum Busby,’
she states. ‘You’ve ignored me for two weeks and I’m willing to forgive you.
Now have you ever wondered why I bothered staying friends with you?’
I stare back,
scared of the answer.
‘It’s because
you impress me.’ She smiles. ‘You take sticks of graphite and tubes of paint
and you create the most beautiful things. You’re picked on because you’re
amazing. And you know what? I like you because I can relate to you. You think
it’s not bullying when every bloody person in this school, bullies or not, sees
right through me because I’m different, because I have weird hair.’ She pauses,
like the words are a struggle. ‘Because I’m not beautiful. I like you because
you are the only one here who actually sees me as a person. Now let me try and
do the same.’
I move towards
the windowsill.
‘Really, Busby?’
She raises her eyebrows. ‘You think you can scale the walls in your jammies?
Get dressed!’
I redden and
turn my back so she can’t see anything. When I turn back round, fully dressed,
she seems curious, even smiling a little.
We edge along
the building and I tremble. I didn’t think I was afraid of heights, but tiptoeing
along a ledge, five stories above the hard, November ground is either wildly
brave or mindlessly stupid.
‘You alright,
Callum?’ Eve asks, as if she is walking through a field with miles of space
either side of her.
‘Fine,’ I snap.
‘Is it the fun
you’re afraid of?’
‘There’s fun
and there’s having a death-wish,’ I hiss.
‘What was
that?’
‘Nothing,’ I
mumble.
‘Better. Now
it’s not much further and it’s worth it.’
We walk past
window after window, with arches far too fancy for boy’s dorms. Sometimes we
pause and dart across, one at a time, because the curtains are open.
There’s a
window ajar and Eve ducks inside. I follow cautiously, grateful to move away
from the scary Ledge of Doom.
I hear a
scratch and hiss and Eve’s face bursts into orange by the flame of a match. Her
eyes are shadowed as if she’s about to start telling a ghost story.
There’s a door
beside a narrow staircase, apparently winding up into nothing.
I look to the
door, then to Eve, no-brows raised.
‘It’s locked,
Sherlock,’ she says. ‘Come on, it’s amazing.’
She grabs my
hand and pulls, her fingers sliding down my palm. I shiver.
I follow her up
the stairs and pray my palms don’t start to sweat.
It’s narrow and
I think I’m going to get stuck as we weave our way higher. Eve slips through
easily with her small, boyish frame.
I collapse
through the hole and flump to the floor. I straighten up, cough and gasp all at
once.
We’re in an
attic, but it’s unlike any attic I’ve ever seen. The ceilings are vaulted, with
beams as thick as a car and heights too dizzying and dark to make out. All
along the sides are windows; arched like the dorms, though these are glassless
and skinny. I imagine I’m an archer, firing my bow against the horde of
oncoming foes.
In the middle
of the room there’s a little camp stove and two sleeping bags.
‘We’re making
s’mores,’ Eve states, as though that’s a normal thing to do at 2 o’clock in the
morning on a Tuesday. ‘And you’re going to tell me which of those pricks did
that to your ear.’
I’m silent.
‘Stop it.’ She grabs my arm.
I look down and
there they are, the eyebrow hairs between my thumb and forefinger; staring up
at me with accusing looks on their follicles.
‘I heard what
happened, Callum, everyone across the pond is talking about it. So there’s no
point lying to me. Sit and talk. I’ll cook.’
‘They cornered
me,’ I begin, my voice cracking a little.
I think it’s
better to just start. My hand aches from the effort. I want to pull. I want to
deface my features because they made me feel insignificant.
The smell of
marshmallows and chocolate fills the cavernous space. Eve cooks and listens.
‘There were
three of them, like always. I started to cry.’
Eve doesn’t
well up for me. She only keeps eye contact, not sad or happy. Neutral: a blank
canvas ready for my expression.
‘You know what
they usually do; hit me where I can’t show people, dunk my head in the toilet,
draw penises on my paintings. But this time it was different. I don’t know why,
it just is sometimes I guess. Maybe it was because I cried. Maybe I looked
weak. Maybe it looked like I deserved it.’
My hand is up
again and Eve doesn’t move, just looks and I see her. I lower it.
The s’more is
on the plate now, gooey and chocolaty. She crosses the space between us and
holds my hand.
‘God it hurt so much Eve. I felt the steel
beneath my skin and I wanted to move it but I couldn’t. I thought I was going
to die in the one room I feel like a person. And there was so much blood.
That’s why James ran away. That’s how they caught him and expelled him in the
end. But you know what? I’m glad I stayed here.’
Eve smiled and
came and hugged me, squeezed me on the dusty floor.
‘You know what
I want you to do?’ she says. ‘I want you to paint and trap that day forever in
the paper. Then you take it to the art room and hang it on the wall to show it
doesn’t scare you any more. Because, to be quite honest, Busby, I think you’d
look better with eyebrows.’
I nod slowly,
face buried in her neck. I always love the curve of her collarbone.
‘I’m sorry I
ignored your problems,’ I whisper. ‘I see you, I see you all the time.’
She snuggles
her face into my hair; her warm breath prickling the nerves that never thought
they’d be touched.
I know that in
Eve I’ve found the person who grabs my hand in the middle of the night and
takes me on an adventure when I’m supposed to have grown out of them. She
smiles when I’m stupid and doesn’t mind when I’m naked.
In the end, I
need Eve because I love her and she loves me in one way or another.
In the end, she
makes me feel at home.
*
The
sun rises bright and true the very next morning, and I wake with a
determination I’m unaccustomed to. Eve looks completely at peace where she lies
in her sleeping bag and I leave her there. I don’t even know if I’ll tell her
it was me when she sees what I’ve done. She’ll know.
I cross the open
space and travel back down the staircase, the cool warmth of the morning sun
giving me the strength I need to travel forward.
Late last
night, lying awake in my sleeping bag, I decided to take matters into my own
hands. Eve has shown me that sometimes a leap of faith is needed. You need to
do things for yourself if you’re ever going to pull yourself from a rut. Eve
deals with her loneliness through exploring this old place, and now she has me.
She’ll always have me.
I have to make
a statement. And now, in the early hours of the morning when everything seems
like a good idea, I move with purpose.
In a few
minutes I’m along the ledge outside, travelling back to my room and grabbing my
bag. It has everything I need.
Creeping
through the school at this hour makes me feel powerful, like the old house is
mine along with everything in it.
I exit the
building and the wall of ice-cold air hits me and fails to knock me down. I
don’t shiver as I round the building, the dew on the long grass wetting the
hems of my trousers.
Setting my bag
down on the grass I survey my canvas. The image I’ve had in my mind for so
long, the painting screaming to escape me finally has an exit.
I unzip the
rucksack and tip everything to the ground.
I work with a
feverish grace that only finds me when I have a brush in my hand.
My arms move as
though possessed, creating great sweeps and swathes of colour. I work for an
hour at least, deeply in my artist’s trance.
The wet of cold
acrylic sprays my face with every brushstroke. A rainbow of colour washes over
my hand, making me a mix of every painting I’ve ever created. The colour finds
my bed hair, sticking out at odd angles, now coloured with the black of
feathers and blue of clear sky and shimmering white of softest clouds.
Eventually I
step back, happy with my work. I’m out of breath, quite proud of my own daring.
It’s graffiti
of the highest order.
I stand, my
brush in one hand. Soaked by the grass, sweat, paint and the morning.
On the wall is
my blackbird. Swooping through the air with cold wind in its feathers. Eve told
me to hang a painting in the art room for everyone to see. I did one better.
I’ll do as she
does and look at the eternal black smudge on my hand, and the paint under my fingernails
as badges of honour. I relax, knowing that I’ve found someone who sees the
world in colour, not just black and white. I turn it outwards and feel the
spread of warmth and thrill in my chest.
The blackbird
on the wall is my moment of daring, my guide and my inspiration.
I am free.
I am the
blackbird. I whistle and sing.
Labels:
anthology,
art,
boarding school,
creative writing,
fiction,
Fincham Press,
hair pulling,
issue led,
long list,
middle grade,
Roehampton University,
school story,
short story,
trichotillomania,
Van Gogh,
writing
Thursday, 13 March 2014
Maybe I Will, Maybe I Won't or 'David Tries Being Employed.'
It has always bothered me that in this society, we are confined to one dream and one career path. Nowadays, you have to select your vocation from primary school age and follow it through adolescence into adulthood. For me, this has always been just about as possible as swimming on Jupiter and living to tell the tale. I cannot remember all the jobs I have wanted to do in my life, because that would take far too much time, probably bore you, and ultimately give me a headache; none of which I have a particular desire to do.
I have recently achieved a 3 month position as an intern with the Wimbledon BookFest. This is a job that I now hope will lead me into a career into publishing. At the same time, I hope it will improve my personal writing. The arrival at 'publicity assistant' was never my intended career path. Who sticks with their intended career path for 20 years? Lucky so-and-sos, that's who.
The Wimbledon BookFest is currently run from the mezzanine of one of their sponsors: Marcus Beale architects. When I walked in for my interview, past a small ocean of iMacs, clean white desks, maquette models of buildings and towns, watercolour paintings and those cool slanty desks architects use, I was reminded of a career dream I had in year 8. I remember year 8 because I recall asking my year 8 RE teacher, a brilliant gent called Mr Linnane (spelled correctly, he hopes): how long you have to go to school/university for to become an architect? The reply: 7 years.
Now, at the time this was an insurmountable amount of time for me to spend at university. This is rich, considering that only a few months ago I had my heart set on doing a Ph. D in English Literature; a profession I now realise I do not have the money or time to take on. I'll be honest, parts of English criticism annoy me. Another blog for another day, but I believe that 3 more years of that was not the right path for me. Nevertheless, quite by accident I was more than prepared to do my 7 years of university.
So I could have been an architect I hear you say. However, I gave up on that dream for another reason. I love art. I always loved it at school, I still love drawing and painting and anything of the sort, but at AS Level I did Art with 3 essay subjects and almost drowned under the workload. Needless to say I gave up Art, and with it that dream.
Then there's the other problem. I don't like to be told what to do. Watchers of Lost may imagine John Locke screaming: 'don't tell me what I can't do!', but I assure you, my story is quite a bit less dramatic.
So I have always written. I have always dreamed of being published, making a lot of money and being rescued from the rat race. Hence my also spending amounts of money I never had on the lottery throughout the 7 years subsequent to my turning 16.
A fear of work maybe? I'd agree with you, but I currently study on a Master's course in Children's Literature, write a book, work as a receptionist in a library and also work at Wimbledon every Thursday and at author events, so that's not it. It's not a fear of work, it's a fear of being stuck. Stuck in a place I don't want to be.
It took me a while, but I soon realised at some point in the last two years that I needed a good job, a realistic job that will give me money and time to do what I liked to do most with my life. Read books, write books, watch films, watch plays, paint paintings, bake cakes and spend days in London in assorted Caffe Neros with the missus. With all of these things, things that I'll never lose or give up, no matter what my job is, I'll never feel stuck. But with that thought in mind lay the question: what am I good at doing?
I arrived at this point after deciding to become a teacher because everyone else was (returning to this idea recently as it appeared I couldn't do anything else). I don't want to be a teacher. The teaching profession is one I respect hugely, yet I know it's not for me. It's like knowing I'm not gay. I have zero problem with homosexuality. I believe, wholeheartedly, and pray the day will come soon when freedom has reached a certain level where the world is not narrow-minded enough to disapprove of things like this. I would do anything to fight for this cause. However, in my heart, I know that isn't me. I respect teachers, but I could never work in such a pressurised, authoritative environment, controlled by the controlling forces *cough* Gove *cough* who make the job damn near impossible.
I was once going to apply for graduate schemes, only to find that they may send me to the far ends of the earth. I love holidays, but I'm not a traveller. I never will be. I am one of the folk of our not so green and pleasant land who is quite happy to stay here, and finds an odd sort of beauty in the oily sheen of a rainsoaked M23.
I arrived at publicity assistant because of luck. Because I found an MA at a lovely London university with a temping office, and was lucky enough to have gathered adequate experience to lead me to Wimbledon. I love meeting authors and thinking about book festivals, and talking to people in the business I have craved since I was 6 years old. Being in the business is good no matter what your entry point, and this is a wonderful dream for me. In the meantime, I very much enjoy my job as a receptionist. To paraphrase Transformers (stay with me), I want the job after this job, but you still have to do the first job first. There's no point in whining about that simple fact of life.
I will never be an architect. I will never be an artist. I will never be a photographer. I will never work in a zoo, learning about fantastic creatures and making friends with elephants. I'll never be a high flying film journalist as I was lucky enough to experience for 11 months last year. Maybe I will experience these things in small ways throughout my life, but my life has told me that writing is my calling. Maybe I'll teach creative writing at a university one day? Maybe I won't. Maybe I'll be published? Maybe I won't. The fact of the matter is I write and continue to write. That's enough for me.
Labels:
2014,
architects,
dreams,
employment,
jobs,
Wimbledon BookFest,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)